Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 12.0 points higher (46.4 vs 34.4) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $3255; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.4 | 46.4 | +34.9% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 34.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,255.40 | $4,967.35 | +52.6% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 52.6% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 26.92s | 46.09s | +71.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 71.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh): 34.9% more intelligence, 52.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 71.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill