Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) vs Grok 4.7 (High)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) by Anthropic or Grok 4.7 (High) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (High) scores 11.9 points higher (46.3 vs 34.4) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($3881 vs $3255; both flagship class). Pick Grok 4.7 (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh).
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) | Grok 4.7 (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 34.4 | 46.3 | +34.6% Grok 4.7 (High) is 34.6% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $3,255.40 | $3,880.88 | +19.2% Grok 4.7 (High) is 19.2% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.97s | 25.34s | +20.8% Grok 4.7 (High) is 20.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (High) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh): 34.6% more intelligence, 19.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
- Grok 4.7 (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Kimi K3.1 Pro scores 55.10 for $3117.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Xhigh)Grok 4.7 (High)Today's Pareto frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/grok-4-7-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5-xhigh/grok-4-7-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill