Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) by Anthropic or MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) scores 12.2 points higher (38.2 vs 26.0) but costs 30× as much to run the benchmark ($6998 vs $231; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) when you need intelligence above 26.0, and MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) when 26.0 is enough.
| Metric | Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) | MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 38.2 | 26.0 | −31.9% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 31.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $6,998.25 | $231.08 | −96.7% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 96.7% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 183.62s | 49.36s | −73.1% MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reason… is 73.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $10.0 | $0.41 / $1.02 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) vs Claude Sonnet 5 (Max): 31.9% less intelligence, 96.7% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 73.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- Claude Sonnet 5 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
- MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
Claude Sonnet 5 (Max)MiMo-V2.5-Pro (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/mimo-v2-5-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/claude-sonnet-5/mimo-v2-5-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill