Command-R+ (Apr '24) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)

Command-R+ (Apr '24) vs DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

CohereCommand-R+ (Apr '24)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.30
Total cost
-
DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricCommand-R+ (Apr '24)DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)5.313.7+158.5% DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-re… is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)Not reported6.55s— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)—$0.56 / $1.68
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerCommand-R+ (Apr '24): what beats itDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/command-r-plus-04-2024/deepseek-v3-1 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/command-r-plus-04-2024/deepseek-v3-1?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill