DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 23.4 points higher (34.8 vs 11.4) but costs 2.3× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $461; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25).
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 34.8 | +205.3% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $1,081.42 | +134.7% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 2.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.16s | 16.10s | −20.1% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 20.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.44 / $1.32 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 205.3% more intelligence, 134.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 20.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/deepseek-v4-flash-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/deepseek-v4-flash-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill