DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)

DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.48.4−26.3% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 26.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$460.74Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)20.16s8.97s−55.5% GLM-4.6V (Non-reasoni… is 55.5% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $4.00$0.30 / $0.90
Input modalitiesTextText, Image
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6v · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/glm-4-6v?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill