DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-6 Luna (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (High)
GPT-6 Luna (High) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 188.6% more intelligence, 89.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 16.2% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-6 Luna (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 32.9 | +188.6% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 2.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $47.85 | −89.6% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 89.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.43s | 21.41s | +16.2% GPT-6 Luna (High) is 16.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Luna (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-6 Luna (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-luna-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-luna-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill