DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)
GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 62.3% more intelligence, 95.8% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 72.9% faster end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 18.5 | +62.3% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 62.3% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $19.16 | −95.8% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 95.8% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 18.69s | 5.06s | −72.9% GPT-6 Luna (Non-reaso… is 72.9% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $0.10 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)GPT-6 Luna (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/gpt-6-luna-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill