DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 35.0 points higher (46.4 vs 11.4) but costs 11× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $461; flagship vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 11.4, and DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) when 11.4 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 11.4 | 46.4 | +307.0% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $460.74 | $4,967.35 | +978.1% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 11× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 20.14s | 46.09s | +128.8% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 128.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $2.00 / $4.00 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): 307.0% more intelligence, 978.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill