DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Ling-flash-2.0

DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Ling-flash-2.0. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
InclusionAILing-flash-2.0Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.80
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Ling-flash-2.0Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.47.8−31.6% Ling-flash-2.0 is 31.6% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$460.74Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)19.94s103.32s+418.2% Ling-flash-2.0 is 418.2% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $4.00$0.14 / $0.57
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats itLing-flash-2.0: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/ling-flash-2-0 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/ling-flash-2-0?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill