DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603

DeepSeek R1 (Jan '25) vs Step 3.5 Flash 2603. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Off the frontier
Intelligence
11.40
Total cost
$461
StepFunStep 3.5 Flash 2603Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
17.00
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25)Step 3.5 Flash 2603Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)11.417.0+49.1% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 49.1% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$460.74Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)20.19s20.55s+1.8% Step 3.5 Flash 2603 is 1.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$2.00 / $4.00$0.10 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 (Jan '25): what beats itStep 3.5 Flash 2603: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/step-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1-0120/step-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill