DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs GLM-5.3 (Low)

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs GLM-5.3 (Low). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
Z AIGLM-5.3 (Low)Off the frontier
Intelligence
34.30
Total cost
$1013
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)GLM-5.3 (Low)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.134.3+161.8% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 2.6× more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reported$1,012.50— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)77.71s31.17s−59.9% GLM-5.3 (Low) is 59.9% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.85 / $2.75$1.40 / $4.40
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25): what beats itGLM-5.3 (Low): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/glm-5-3-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/glm-5-3-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill