DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Ling 3.0 Flash

DeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25) vs Ling 3.0 Flash. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.10
Total cost
-
InclusionAILing 3.0 FlashNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
20.10
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25)Ling 3.0 FlashDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.120.1+53.4% Ling 3.0 Flash is 53.4% more intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)77.71s10.63s−86.3% Ling 3.0 Flash is 86.3% faster
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$1.85 / $2.75$0.07 / $0.22
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek R1 0528 (May '25): what beats itLing 3.0 Flash: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/ling-3-0-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-r1/ling-3-0-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill