DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) scores 22.9 points higher (32.6 vs 9.7) but costs 212× as much to run the benchmark ($4222 vs $19.9; flagship vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 32.6 | +236.1% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 3.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $4,222.12 | +21148.7% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 212× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 16.46s | +256.3% Gemini 3.5 Flash (Hig… is 256.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.50 / $9.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 236.1% more intelligence, 21148.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 256.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Gemini 3.5 Flash (High) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 3.5 Flash (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-3-5-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-3-5-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill