DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) scores 30.1 points higher (39.8 vs 9.7) but costs 55× as much to run the benchmark ($1100 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 39.8 | +310.3% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $1,100.06 | +5436.3% Gemini 3.8 Flash (Med… is 55× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.75 / $3.75 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 310.3% more intelligence, 5436.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 0324Gemini 3.8 Flash (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-3-8-flash-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemini-3-8-flash-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill