DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V3 0324 scores 0.8 points higher (9.7 vs 8.9) but costs 1.4× as much to run the benchmark ($19.9 vs $14.7; both budget class). Pick DeepSeek V3 0324 when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 8.9 | −8.2% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 8.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $14.68 | −26.1% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 26.1% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.86s | 57.72s | +1087.7% Gemma 4 E4B (Reasonin… is 1087.7% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.02 / $0.10 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 8.2% less intelligence, 26.1% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1087.7% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
DeepSeek V3 0324Gemma 4 E4B (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemma-4-e4b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/gemma-4-e4b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill