DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 28.2 points higher (37.9 vs 9.7) but costs 5.5× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 37.9 | +290.7% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.9× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $109.55 | +451.3% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 5.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.86s | 49.26s | +913.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 913.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 290.7% more intelligence, 451.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 913.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V3 0324MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill