DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 36.6 points higher (46.3 vs 9.7) but costs 10× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 46.3 | +377.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 4.8× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $206.66 | +940.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 10× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.96s | 48.29s | +873.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 873.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 377.3% more intelligence, 940.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 873.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V3 0324MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill