DeepSeek V3 0324 vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 33.0 points higher (42.7 vs 9.7) but costs 14× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $19.9; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 42.7 | +340.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 4.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $283.18 | +1325.2% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 14× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.37s | 22.73s | +420.1% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 420.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 340.2% more intelligence, 1325.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 420.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V3 0324MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill