DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Mistral Medium 3.5
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Mistral Medium 3.5 by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Mistral Medium 3.5 scores 4.5 points higher (14.2 vs 9.7) but costs 64× as much to run the benchmark ($1264 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Mistral Medium 3.5 when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Mistral Medium 3.5 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 14.2 | +46.4% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 46.4% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $1,263.80 | +6260.3% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 64× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.62s | 17.77s | +284.6% Mistral Medium 3.5 is 284.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.50 / $7.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
Mistral Medium 3.5 vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 46.4% more intelligence, 6260.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 284.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Mistral Medium 3.5 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 0324Mistral Medium 3.5Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mistral-medium-3-5 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/mistral-medium-3-5?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill