DeepSeek V3 0324 vs Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 0324 by DeepSeek or Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) by Meta? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) scores 29.9 points higher (39.6 vs 9.7) but costs 70× as much to run the benchmark ($1385 vs $19.9; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 9.7, and DeepSeek V3 0324 when 9.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 0324 | Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 9.7 | 39.6 | +308.2% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 4.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $19.87 | $1,385.40 | +6872.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 70× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.38s | 20.60s | +370.3% Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is 370.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.24 / $0.90 | $1.25 / $4.25 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V3 0324: 308.2% more intelligence, 6872.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 370.3% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 0324 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 0324Muse Spark 1.2 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/muse-spark-1-2 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-0324/muse-spark-1-2?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill