DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
5.90
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Phi-4Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.75.9−56.9% Phi-4 is 56.9% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.55s15.51s+136.8% Phi-4 is 136.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68$0.13 / $0.50
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/phi-4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/phi-4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill