DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct

DeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning) vs Phi-4 Mini Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
13.70
Total cost
-
MicrosoftPhi-4 Mini InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.30
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning)Phi-4 Mini InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)13.76.3−54.0% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 54.0% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)Not reportedNot reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)6.55s11.81s+80.3% Phi-4 Mini Instruct is 80.3% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.56 / $1.68$0.07 / $0.30
Input modalitiesTextText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V3.1 (Non-reasoning): what beats itPhi-4 Mini Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/phi-4-mini · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3-1/phi-4-mini?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill