DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview by Google? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview scores 21.2 points higher (29.7 vs 8.5) but costs 76× as much to run the benchmark ($1935 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 29.7 | +249.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 3.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $1,935.39 | +7528.7% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 76× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 24.90s | +109.4% Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is 109.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 249.4% more intelligence, 7528.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 109.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Max) scores 51.80 for $1082.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Gemini 3.1 Pro PreviewToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/gemini-3-1-pro-preview · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/gemini-3-1-pro-preview?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill