DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Flash by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 29.4 points higher (37.9 vs 8.5) but costs 4.3× as much to run the benchmark ($110 vs $25.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Flash when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | MiMo-V2.6-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 37.9 | +345.9% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.5× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $109.55 | +331.8% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4.3× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 49.53s | +316.6% MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 316.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $0.14 / $0.28 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image |
MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 345.9% more intelligence, 331.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 316.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Flash is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)MiMo-V2.6-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/mimo-v2-6-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/mimo-v2-6-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill