DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 37.8 points higher (46.3 vs 8.5) but costs 8.1× as much to run the benchmark ($207 vs $25.4; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 46.3 | +444.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 5.4× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $206.66 | +714.6% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 8.1× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | 48.29s | +306.1% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 306.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 444.7% more intelligence, 714.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 306.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill