DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) vs Solar Pro 4
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 4 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Solar Pro 4 scores 18.1 points higher (26.6 vs 8.5) but costs 29× as much to run the benchmark ($737 vs $25.4; premium vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Solar Pro 4 when you need intelligence above 8.5, and DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) when 8.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) | Solar Pro 4 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 8.5 | 26.6 | +212.9% Solar Pro 4 is 3.1× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $25.37 | $736.82 | +2804.3% Solar Pro 4 is 29× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 11.89s | Not reported | — not comparable |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.32 / $0.89 | $0.30 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text | Text |
Solar Pro 4 vs DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24): 212.9% more intelligence, 2804.3% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and end-to-end time not fully reported.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Low) scores 21.50 for $10.6.
- Solar Pro 4 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
DeepSeek V3 (Dec '24)Solar Pro 4Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/solar-pro4 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v3/solar-pro4?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill