DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902)
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
Verdict
Comparison incomplete
A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (High) | Qwen3.8 Max (0902) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 28.5 | 33.6 | +17.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 17.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | Not reported | $6,353.83 | — not comparable |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.46s | 68.67s | +374.9% Qwen3.8 Max (0902) is 374.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/qwen3-8-max · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-high/qwen3-8-max?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill