DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (High)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (High) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-31.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 31.7 points higher (50.2 vs 18.5) but costs 1.8× as much to run the benchmark ($573 vs $310; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (High) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) | GPT-6.1 Sol (High) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 18.5 | 50.2 | +171.4% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 2.7× more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $310.24 | $573.17 | +84.8% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 84.8% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 4.11s | 75.29s | +1731.9% GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is 1731.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (High) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning): 171.4% more intelligence, 84.8% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1731.9% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (High) scores 42.30 for $267.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (High) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Non-reasoning)GPT-6.1 Sol (High)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-high · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017-non-reasoning/gpt-6-1-sol-high?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill