DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 5.9 points higher (51.0 vs 45.1) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($662 vs $445; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 51.0 | +13.1% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 13.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $662.28 | +49.0% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 49.0% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.55s | 86.31s | +493.2% GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is 493.2% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $10.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 13.1% more intelligence, 49.0% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 493.2% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/gpt-6-1-sol-xhigh?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill