DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 31.1 points higher (45.1 vs 14.0) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $216; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 14.0 | −69.0% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 69.0% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $215.93 | −51.4% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 51.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.96s | 5.81s | −63.6% Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoni… is 63.6% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.25 / $2.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 69.0% less intelligence, 51.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 63.6% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Grok 4.3 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/grok-4-3-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/grok-4-3-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill