DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Hy3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Hy3 by Tencent? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-24.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 19.8 points higher (45.1 vs 25.3) but costs 3.0× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $150; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Hy3.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Hy3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 25.3 | −43.9% Hy3 is 43.9% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $149.61 | −66.3% Hy3 is 66.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.55s | 33.29s | +128.8% Hy3 is 128.8% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.14 / $0.56 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Hy3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 43.9% less intelligence, 66.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 128.8% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Hy3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Max) scores 38.10 for $122.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Hy3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/hy3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/hy3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill