DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or MiMo-V2.6-Pro by Xiaomi? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick MiMo-V2.6-Pro
MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 2.7% more intelligence, 53.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 193.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | MiMo-V2.6-Pro | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 46.3 | +2.7% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2.7% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $206.66 | −53.5% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 53.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.97s | 46.84s | +193.3% MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 193.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image, Speech, Video |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- MiMo-V2.6-Pro is on today's frontier: nothing is both smarter and cheaper.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)MiMo-V2.6-ProToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/mimo-v2-6-pro · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/mimo-v2-6-pro?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill