DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Ministral 3 14B
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Ministral 3 14B by Mistral? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 39.1 points higher (45.1 vs 6.0) but costs 12× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $37.6; mid-range vs budget cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when you need intelligence above 6.0, and Ministral 3 14B when 6.0 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Ministral 3 14B | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 6.0 | −86.7% Ministral 3 14B is 86.7% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $37.56 | −91.6% Ministral 3 14B is 91.6% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.98s | 8.02s | −49.8% Ministral 3 14B is 49.8% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $0.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Ministral 3 14B vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 86.7% less intelligence, 91.6% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 49.8% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Ministral 3 14B is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Ministral 3 14BToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/ministral-3-14b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/ministral-3-14b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill