DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) by DeepSeek or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL by NVIDIA? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) scores 18.6 points higher (45.1 vs 26.5) but costs 1.6× as much to run the benchmark ($445 vs $283; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Nemotron 3.5 Super VL.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) | Nemotron 3.5 Super VL | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 45.1 | 26.5 | −41.2% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 41.2% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $444.60 | $282.51 | −36.5% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 36.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.96s | 6.33s | −60.3% Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is 60.3% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.23 / $0.57 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max): 41.2% less intelligence, 36.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 60.3% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash 1017 (Max)Nemotron 3.5 Super VLToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/nemotron-3-5-super-vl · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-1017/nemotron-3-5-super-vl?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill