DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) scores 10.1 points higher (34.8 vs 24.7) but costs 4.5× as much to run the benchmark ($1081 vs $239; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) when you need intelligence above 24.7, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when 24.7 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 34.8 | +40.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 40.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $1,081.42 | +352.6% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 4.5× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.74s | 16.08s | +486.9% DeepSeek V4 Flash Vis… is 486.9% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.44 / $1.32 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 40.9% more intelligence, 352.6% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 486.9% slower end-to-end.
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- DeepSeek V4 Flash Vision (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
Compare something else
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-flash-vision · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-flash-vision?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill