DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) scores 5.7 points higher (30.4 vs 24.7) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($277 vs $239; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 30.4 | +23.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 23.1% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $277.30 | +16.1% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 16.1% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.82s | 47.95s | +1600.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 … is 1600.4% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.43 / $0.87 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 23.1% more intelligence, 16.1% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 1600.4% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0424 (Max)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-pro-0424 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-pro-0424?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill