DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 17.4% less intelligence, 88.7% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 139.0% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 20.4 | −17.4% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 17.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $450.76 | +88.7% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 88.7% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.82s | 6.74s | +139.0% DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 … is 139.0% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.32 / $3.96 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Medium) scores 47.80 for $361.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)DeepSeek V4 Pro 0813 (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/deepseek-v4-pro-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill