DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)
GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 1.2% more intelligence, 81.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 119.5% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 25.0 | +1.2% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 1.2% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $44.32 | −81.4% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 81.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.82s | 6.19s | +119.5% GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is 119.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.20 / $1.20 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6 Luna (Medium) scores 29.90 for $31.2.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)GPT-5.6 Luna (Medium)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-medium · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/gpt-5-6-luna-medium?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill