DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
$239
MetaLlama 3.1 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.60
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.1 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.76.6−73.3% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 73.3% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$238.91Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.74s14.51s+429.6% Llama 3.1 Instruct 70B is 429.6% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.56 / $0.56
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.1 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/llama-3-1-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill