DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
$239
MetaLlama 3.3 Instruct 70BNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
7.70
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Llama 3.3 Instruct 70BDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.77.7−68.8% Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B is 68.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$238.91Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.72s7.42s+172.8% Llama 3.3 Instruct 70B is 172.8% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20$0.66 / $0.71
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itLlama 3.3 Instruct 70B: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/llama-3-3-instruct-70b · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/llama-3-3-instruct-70b?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill