DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs MiniMax-M3.1-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or MiniMax-M3.1-Flash by MiniMax? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash scores 18.0 points higher (42.7 vs 24.7) but costs 1.2× as much to run the benchmark ($283 vs $239; both mid-range class). Pick MiniMax-M3.1-Flash when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | MiniMax-M3.1-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 42.7 | +72.9% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 72.9% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $283.18 | +18.5% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 18.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.74s | 22.73s | +729.6% MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is 729.6% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
MiniMax-M3.1-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 72.9% more intelligence, 18.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 729.6% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- MiniMax-M3.1-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)MiniMax-M3.1-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/minimax-m3-1-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill