DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct. A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Off the frontier
Intelligence
24.70
Total cost
$239
Allen Institute for AIOlmo 3.1 32B InstructNot ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
6.50
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Olmo 3.1 32B InstructDifference
Intelligence (higher is better)24.76.5−73.7% Olmo 3.1 32B Instruct is 73.7% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$238.91Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)2.72sNot reported— not comparable
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.30 / $1.20—
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): what beats itOlmo 3.1 32B Instruct: what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/olmo-3-1-32b-instruct?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill