DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) by Alibaba? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)
Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 48.6% less intelligence, 20.5% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 681.1% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 12.7 | −48.6% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 48.6% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $193.84 | $233.56 | +20.5% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 20.5% more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.91s | 22.73s | +681.1% Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 … is 681.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.23 / $2.30 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Terra (Medium) scores 41.30 for $175.
- Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Qwen3 235B A22B 2507 (Reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/qwen3-235b-a22b-instruct-2507-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill