DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) vs Solar Pro 3
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) by DeepSeek or Solar Pro 3 by Upstage? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) scores 16.9 points higher (24.7 vs 7.8) but costs 1.5× as much to run the benchmark ($239 vs $159; both mid-range class). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise Solar Pro 3.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) | Solar Pro 3 | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 24.7 | 7.8 | −68.4% Solar Pro 3 is 68.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $238.91 | $159.22 | −33.4% Solar Pro 3 is 33.4% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 2.72s | 18.89s | +594.5% Solar Pro 3 is 594.5% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.60 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text |
Solar Pro 3 vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning): 68.4% less intelligence, 33.4% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 594.5% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
- Solar Pro 3 is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Haiku 5.5 (Xhigh) scores 41.20 for $158.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Non-reasoning)Solar Pro 3Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash-non-reasoning/solar-pro-3?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill