DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)

DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GLM-4.7 (Reasoning). A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

DeepSeekDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Off the frontier
Intelligence
39.50
Total cost
$672
Z AIGLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Not ranked · benchmark data missing
Intelligence
22.20
Total cost
-
Verdict

Comparison incomplete

A reliable intelligence-versus-cost verdict requires both models' intelligence scores and benchmark-run costs. Missing data is not a performance verdict.

MetricDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GLM-4.7 (Reasoning)Difference
Intelligence (higher is better)39.522.2−43.8% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 43.8% less intelligent
Total AA cost (lower is better)$671.96Not reported— not comparable
End-to-end time (lower is better)14.98s71.61s+378.0% GLM-4.7 (Reasoning) is 378.0% slower
Price per 1M tokens (in / out)$0.29 / $1.20$0.53 / $2.10
Input modalitiesText, ImageText
Open this matchup in the interactive pickerDeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): what beats itGLM-4.7 (Reasoning): what beats it
Matchup

Compare something else

Agents: Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/glm-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/glm-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill