DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GLM-5.3-Flash
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GLM-5.3-Flash by Z AI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Clear winner
Verdict
Pick GLM-5.3-Flash
GLM-5.3-Flash vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 5.8% more intelligence, 54.5% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 159.3% slower end-to-end.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GLM-5.3-Flash | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 41.8 | +5.8% GLM-5.3-Flash is 5.8% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $305.52 | −54.5% GLM-5.3-Flash is 54.5% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.00s | 38.89s | +159.3% GLM-5.3-Flash is 159.3% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $0.15 / $0.50 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- GLM-5.3-Flash is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GLM-5.3-FlashToday's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/glm-5-3-flash · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/glm-5-3-flash?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill