DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-26.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 18.7 points higher (39.5 vs 20.8) but costs 2.1× as much to run the benchmark ($526 vs $256; premium vs mid-range cost classes). Pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when the extra intelligence is worth the premium, otherwise GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning).
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 20.8 | −47.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 47.3% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $525.65 | $255.77 | −51.3% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 51.3% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.08s | 5.11s | −66.1% GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-re… is 66.1% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $12.0 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 47.3% less intelligence, 51.3% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 66.1% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores 46.30 for $207.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-5.6 Terra (Non-reasoning)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-5-6-terra-non-reasoning?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill