DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) by OpenAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-27.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) scores 3.3 points higher (39.5 vs 36.2) but costs 4.6× as much to run the benchmark ($525 vs $115; premium vs mid-range cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when you need intelligence above 36.2, and GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) when 36.2 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 36.2 | −8.4% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 8.4% less intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $524.72 | $114.52 | −78.2% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 78.2% cheaper |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 14.97s | 6.78s | −54.7% GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is 54.7% faster |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.30 / $1.20 | $1.00 / $5.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 8.4% less intelligence, 78.2% less cost to run the AA benchmark, and 54.7% faster end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (High) scores 50.20 for $521.
- GPT-6.1 Terra (Low) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores 37.90 for $110.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)GPT-6.1 Terra (Low)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-low · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/gpt-6-1-terra-low?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill