DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) vs Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)
Which is better for the money: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) by DeepSeek or Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) by SpaceXAI? Intelligence, total benchmark cost, and end-to-end time from Artificial Analysis & other sources, snapshot 2026-10-25.
Trade-off
Verdict
Depends on your budget
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) scores 6.9 points higher (46.4 vs 39.5) but costs 7.4× as much to run the benchmark ($4967 vs $672; flagship vs premium cost classes). They are not alternatives at one budget: pick Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) when you need intelligence above 39.5, and DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) when 39.5 is enough.
| Metric | DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) | Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intelligence (higher is better) | 39.5 | 46.4 | +17.5% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 17.5% more intelligent |
| Total AA cost (lower is better) | $671.96 | $4,967.35 | +639.2% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 7.4× more expensive |
| End-to-end time (lower is better) | 15.00s | 40.07s | +167.1% Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is 167.1% slower |
| Price per 1M tokens (in / out) | $0.29 / $1.20 | $2.00 / $6.00 | |
| Input modalities | Text, Image | Text, Image |
Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) vs DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max): 17.5% more intelligence, 639.2% more cost to run the AA benchmark, and 167.1% slower end-to-end.
Today's Pareto frontier
Against the frontier
- DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, GPT-6.1 Sol (Xhigh) scores 51.00 for $662.
- Grok 4.7 (Xhigh) is off the frontier: at the same or lower cost, Claude Opus 5.5 (Xhigh, Default Fallback) scores 56.00 for $4057.
DeepSeek V4.1 Flash (Max)Grok 4.7 (Xhigh)Today's Pareto frontierOpen-weights frontierEvery other model
Matchup
Compare something else
Agents:
Accept: text/markdown or ?format=md returns this page as Markdown. JSON: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/grok-4-7 · Markdown: /api/v1/compare/deepseek-v4-1-flash/grok-4-7?format=md · llms.txt · agent skill